You can’t
really watch TV, listen to the radio or read the newspaper in Israel now days without
coming across the question: “should Israel bomb the nuclear facilities in Iran,
or not?” It seems to be the ultimate “you’re damn if you do and you’re damn if
you’re not” question. There are little, if any doubts that Iran is frantically
racing towards the production of nuclear weapons. The specter of a nuclear Iran keeps many in the
Middle East, Europe and America awake at night.
The diplomatic
efforts to slow down or even stop Iran from pursuing its nuclear ambitions
yielded disappointing results thus far. After all, why shouldn't the Iranian
regime pursue a nuclear weapon? India has it, Pakistan has it, and even North
Korea has it. Plus the lesson they learned from their former neighbor/enemy - Saddam
Hussein - was that regimes which are unpopular with the international community
might be toppled by force. You can’t really “blame” them for wanting to join the
nuclear club. Alas, if only their motivations were “defense” oriented...
The Iranian
regime aspirations go far beyond governing their own country. Their desire to spread
their so called “Islamic revolution” led them to actively engage in conflicts
in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Gaza, and more. Their interventions often involve subversive
terror tactics – not what you expect from a sovereign state. One can only imagine
the extent and nature of these interventions under a protective nuclear umbrella.
Most alarming
to Israel are the public declarations made by the Iranian president, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, of his intent and commitment to annihilate
Israel. With a nuclear weapon under his command, he will be in a position
to do so. One may think that no country is “insane enough” to launch a nuclear
attack, since it will lead to its own destruction, or even trigger World War
III. But we’re not talking about a “sane” regime. We’re talking about religious
fanatics that believe they are on a “mission from god”. The world has seen
fanatics before, but never with a nuclear bomb in their command.
Israel isn’t
the only country in the region threatened by a nuclear Iran. The century-old animosity
between Shiite and Sunni Muslims will definitely take a new turn. There is no
love lost, to say it gently, between Iran who is Shiite and other Sunni states
such as Saudi Arabia, the Arabic Gulf states, Egypt, Jordan, and soon to
be Syria. To counter a potential Shiite dominance those Sunni states will be
force to seek nuclear weapons of their own. Did somebody say Armageddon?
So what
should the “world” do? The answer seems simple – stop Iran either through diplomacy
or by force. But the world is a fractured entity now days. The USA is mired by
economic problems, a presidential race, and is still licking its wounds from
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Europe is busy trying to save itself from the
Euro collapse. Russia and China have mixed feelings about intervening with
other semi-totalitarian regimes. Plus there is the question of oil supply and
economic risks associated with any military action against Iran.
As time runs
out on stopping Iran from achieving its nuclear objectives, Israel is left
alone facing the decision whether to act now, or face the risk of a nuclear threat
from Iran.
Bombing Iran
is no simple task. There is the challenge of mounting an air offensive thousands
of kilometers away, penetrating air defenses, and destroying nuclear facilities
hidden in underground bunkers. If it sounds like “mission impossible” - it probably
is. But let’s assume that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) can overcome those
challenges. Then what?
Iran is not
going to sit idle. They will likely launch a counter attack using surface-to-surface
missiles. Those will be launched by Iran, or by its minions in the region: Hezbollah, Hamas, and whatever’s left from Assad
regime in Syria. IDF specialists
estimate the casualties from a counter-attack to be “under 500”. Sounds like a reasonable
price to pay in order to prevent a nuclear catastrophe. Unless of course you or
your family happen to be one of the “chosen” ones.
Plus there are
the economic side effects: sharp increase in oil prices, decline in world stock
markets, potential embargos against Israel, drop in foreign investments and
tourism – in short a local and possibly global recession.
To bomb or
not to bomb – that is the question. Or in the words of Shakespeare’s Hamlet:
“To be, or
not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis
nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings
and arrows of outrageous fortune
Or to take
arms against a sea of troubles
And by
opposing end them?”
Hamlet ordeal
didn’t end too well… I hope this one does.
No comments:
Post a Comment